Articles | Volume 10, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-951-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-951-2018
Review article
 | 
01 Jun 2018
Review article |  | 01 Jun 2018

Historical gridded reconstruction of potential evapotranspiration for the UK

Maliko Tanguy, Christel Prudhomme, Katie Smith, and Jamie Hannaford

Related authors

Added value of seasonal hindcasts to create UK hydrological drought storylines
Wilson C. H. Chan, Nigel W. Arnell, Geoff Darch, Katie Facer-Childs, Theodore G. Shepherd, and Maliko Tanguy
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1065–1078, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1065-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1065-2024, 2024
Short summary
Divergent future drought projections in UK river flows and groundwater levels
Simon Parry, Jonathan D. Mackay, Thomas Chitson, Jamie Hannaford, Eugene Magee, Maliko Tanguy, Victoria A. Bell, Katie Facer-Childs, Alison Kay, Rosanna Lane, Robert J. Moore, Stephen Turner, and John Wallbank
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 417–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024, 2024
Short summary
Indicator-to-impact links to help improve agricultural drought preparedness in Thailand
Maliko Tanguy, Michael Eastman, Eugene Magee, Lucy J. Barker, Thomas Chitson, Chaiwat Ekkawatpanit, Daniel Goodwin, Jamie Hannaford, Ian Holman, Liwa Pardthaisong, Simon Parry, Dolores Rey Vicario, and Supattra Visessri
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2419–2441, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2419-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2419-2023, 2023
Short summary
Historic hydrological droughts 1891–2015: systematic characterisation for a diverse set of catchments across the UK
Lucy J. Barker, Jamie Hannaford, Simon Parry, Katie A. Smith, Maliko Tanguy, and Christel Prudhomme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4583–4602, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4583-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4583-2019, 2019
Short summary
A multi-objective ensemble approach to hydrological modelling in the UK: an application to historic drought reconstruction
Katie A. Smith, Lucy J. Barker, Maliko Tanguy, Simon Parry, Shaun Harrigan, Tim P. Legg, Christel Prudhomme, and Jamie Hannaford
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3247–3268, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3247-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3247-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Hydrology
A hydrogeomorphic dataset for characterizing catchment hydrological behavior across the Tibetan Plateau
Yuhan Guo, Hongxing Zheng, Yuting Yang, Yanfang Sang, and Congcong Wen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1651–1665, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1651-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1651-2024, 2024
Short summary
A synthesis of Global Streamflow Characteristics, Hydrometeorology, and Catchment Attributes (GSHA) for large sample river-centric studies
Ziyun Yin, Peirong Lin, Ryan Riggs, George H. Allen, Xiangyong Lei, Ziyan Zheng, and Siyu Cai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1559–1587, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1559-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1559-2024, 2024
Short summary
FOCA: a new quality-controlled database of floods and catchment descriptors in Italy
Pierluigi Claps, Giulia Evangelista, Daniele Ganora, Paola Mazzoglio, and Irene Monforte
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1503–1522, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1503-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1503-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dams in the Mekong: a comprehensive database, spatiotemporal distribution, and hydropower potentials
Wei Jing Ang, Edward Park, Yadu Pokhrel, Dung Duc Tran, and Ho Huu Loc
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1209–1228, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1209-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1209-2024, 2024
Short summary
A global dataset of the shape of drainage systems
Chuanqi He, Ci-Jian Yang, Jens M. Turowski, Richard F. Ott, Jean Braun, Hui Tang, Shadi Ghantous, Xiaoping Yuan, and Gaia Stucky de Quay
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1151–1166, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1151-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1151-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Fao irrigation and drainage paper 56 – crop evapotranspiration – guidelines for computing crop water requirements, Rome, 1998. 
Aràndiga, F., Donat, R., and Santágueda, M.: The PCHIP subdivision scheme, Appl. Math. Comput., 272, 28–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.07.071, 2016. 
Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., and Liu, C.: Assessment of the Influences of Different Potential Evapotranspiration Inputs on the Performance of Monthly Hydrological Models under Different Climatic Conditions, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2259–2274, doi10.1175/JHM-D-15-0202.1, 2016. 
Balkovič, J., van der Velde, M., Schmid, E., Skalský, R., Khabarov, N., Obersteiner, M., Stürmer, B., and Xiong, W.: Pan-European crop modelling with EPIC: Implementation, up-scaling and regional crop yield validation, Agr. Syst., 120, 61–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.05.008, 2013. 
Barik, M. G.: Remote Sensing-based Estimates of Potential Evapotranspiration for Hydrologic Modeling in the Upper Colorado River Basin Region, PhD, Civil Engineering 0300 UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, 146 pp., 2014. 
Download
Short summary
Potential evapotranspiration (PET) is necessary input data for most hydrological models, used to simulate river flows. To reconstruct PET prior to the 1960s, simplified methods are needed because of lack of climate data required for complex methods. We found that the McGuinness–Bordne PET equation, which only needs temperature as input data, works best for the UK provided it is calibrated for local conditions. This method was used to produce a 5 km gridded PET dataset for the UK for 1891–2015.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint