Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-683-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-683-2020
Data description paper
 | 
23 Mar 2020
Data description paper |  | 23 Mar 2020

Soil moisture and matric potential – an open field comparison of sensor systems

Conrad Jackisch, Kai Germer, Thomas Graeff, Ines Andrä, Katrin Schulz, Marcus Schiedung, Jaqueline Haller-Jans, Jonas Schneider, Julia Jaquemotte, Philipp Helmer, Leander Lotz, Andreas Bauer, Irene Hahn, Martin Šanda, Monika Kumpan, Johann Dorner, Gerrit de Rooij, Stefan Wessel-Bothe, Lorenz Kottmann, Siegfried Schittenhelm, and Wolfgang Durner

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Conrad Jackisch on behalf of the Authors (18 Dec 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (11 Jan 2020) by Giulio G.R. Iovine
RR by Heye Bogena (11 Jan 2020)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (30 Jan 2020) by Giulio G.R. Iovine
AR by Conrad Jackisch on behalf of the Authors (14 Feb 2020)  Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (21 Feb 2020) by Giulio G.R. Iovine
AR by Conrad Jackisch on behalf of the Authors (21 Feb 2020)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Soil water content and matric potential are central hydrological state variables. A large variety of automated probes and sensor systems for field monitoring exist. In a field experiment under idealised conditions we compared 15 systems for soil moisture and 14 systems for matric potential. The individual records of one system agree well with the others. Most records are also plausible. However, the absolute values of the different measuring systems span a very large range of possible truths.